How the media write about science and space · over the last 6 days

For every domain that writes about science and space, a language model rates the tone of its articles as positive, neutral or negative. That gives a tone index from 0 to 100, where 50 is balanced. At the top are the domains that frame the news most positively, at the bottom the most negatively.

#	Domain	Articles	Tone index	Pos / Neg
1	nasa.govArticles 24 · Pos / Neg 33% / 0%	24	100Strongly positive	33% / 0%
2	popsci.comArticles 26 · Pos / Neg 46% / 4%	26	92Strongly positive	46% / 4%
3	sciencedaily.comArticles 26 · Pos / Neg 73% / 8%	26	91Strongly positive	73% / 8%
4	naked-science.ruArticles 29 · Pos / Neg 45% / 7%	29	87Strongly positive	45% / 7%
5	phys.orgArticles 254 · Pos / Neg 63% / 11%	254	85Strongly positive	63% / 11%
6	nature.comArticles 172 · Pos / Neg 23% / 5%	172	81Strongly positive	23% / 5%
7	sciencealert.comArticles 33 · Pos / Neg 39% / 9%	33	81Strongly positive	39% / 9%
8	space.comArticles 38 · Pos / Neg 37% / 11%	38	78Strongly positive	37% / 11%
9	earth.comArticles 87 · Pos / Neg 46% / 14%	87	77Strongly positive	46% / 14%
10	scientificamerican.comArticles 26 · Pos / Neg 31% / 31%	26	50Neutral	31% / 31%

Showing domains with ≥24 rated articles. 10 of 46 ranked. How it is calculated →

This is the tone of the articles as a model reads them, not a rating of a domain's quality, reliability or bias. A high index often only means a domain writes more about rallies and launches, a low one more about sell-offs, hacks and lawsuits.